| More

Friday 30 November 2012

'Postgraduate study is the next social mobility timebomb'

With seismic changes planned for school exams and undergraduate fee increases still fresh, the government might have hoped to keep postgraduate issues tucked safely away in a study. But it would do so at the UK's peril, suggests a report to be published next week.
In it, the Higher Education Commission, a cross-party group of MPs and representatives from business and academia, paints a dire picture of the country's economic future and global position unless postgraduate education is "brought in from the cold" and treated as part of a holistic vision for education.
It describes postgraduates as "the new frontier of widening participation", arguing that while postgraduate qualifications are increasingly becoming the norm for many professions and careers, higher undergraduate fees and banks' unwillingness to offer loans make this level of study less and less accessible for poorer or debt-averse students.
"If we don't pay attention … this area of education will be closed to some people because of cost and accessibility," says Graham Spittle, chair of the commission. "We will probably not be able to grow the indigenous talent we need to staff our universities, which, if you like, are the factories that groom the next generation. We are probably hindering ourselves from getting the strong technical leaders and entrepreneurs that society is going to need – that we're all going to need – in the future."
The commission, he says, found clear evidence that students did not want to increase their level of debt by going on to postgraduate study and some had already decided against it for that reason.
Referring to postgraduate education as a "social-mobility timebomb", the report echoes Alan Milburn, former Labour minister, now government adviser, who called last week for universities to make more efforts to help students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Milburn used the same phrase in an interview with the Higher Education Careers Services Unit's magazine earlier this year, adding: "Everyone agrees that nobody should be barred from undergraduate education because they can't afford fees, and yet we completely accept this barrier when it comes to postgraduate education. The fact is, postgraduate education is not a luxury for the individual, it is a necessity for our economy and wider society." His fear was that the problem required money and there was not much of that around.
The commission's report says to avoid spending on postgraduates would be a false economy, warning that "education and skills is one of the key fronts on which the battle to maintain competitiveness will be fought", with India, China and South Korea proving an increasing threat.
Spittle says: "Some of this will cost money, but the opportunity cost is unbelievable given that we want to become a skills-based economy. I think we have no choice but to pay attention to this area. It doesn't all have to be funded out of the public purse, but we need to strategically make choices as a country about what we are doing here and not just let market forces take their effect."
The report agrees with Milburn's proposals last week that some kind of postgraduate loan scheme is needed, and goes further, calling for a taskforce to be set up immediately to look into how it might work, reporting by December next year with a view to having something in place by September 2015, when the first undergraduates to pay £9,000 tuition fees will be graduating. This should please students, who have been looking for clear recognition that financial help for postgraduates is urgently needed.
There are even suggestions of different loan schemes that could be considered, including one drafted by Tim Leunig, now an adviser to the education secretary, Michael Gove, which could help propel the idea through parliament.
In the long term, the report suggests, undergraduate and postgraduate funding should be integrated. It also proposes that future postgraduate applications should be processed, like those of undergraduates, through the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service. This would make it easier to monitor admissions data, including information about the socio-economic backgrounds of students.
This idea of a more seamless sector is perhaps not surprising from a commission specifically set up to take a broad, strategic view. This is its first report and it will decide at a meeting this week what to tackle next.
Postgraduates were chosen as the first area to look at because they were seen as a neglected part of the sector, in spite of a review carried out just over two years ago by Adrian Smith, now vice-chancellor of the University of London. This identified a need for more information about postgraduates and called for Lord Browne to consider how they should be funded in his report on student finance, then in the pipeline.
In the event, Lord Browne's report hardly touched on this part of the sector, and the Smith review was largely overtaken by a change of government and the impact of higher undergraduate fees, although there has been much more emphasis since on postgraduate data collection.
Spittle says that nothing in the commission's report contradicts Smith's review but "the world is a very different place". "We refer to a perfect storm facing students today. And that is something that is new and was not around three years ago."
What has also changed is the government's stance on immigration, with tougher visa regulations making it harder for postgraduates to stay on after they finish their studies and the government's pledge to reduce immigration to "tens of thousands a year".
The commission warns that the higher education sector would be "significantly damaged, particularly at postgraduate level," were this pledge realised, with many courses in strategically important disciplines relying on international students to remain viable. It predicts course and even departmental closures and long-term damage to British research capacity and competitiveness, and calls for students to be removed from the immigration cap completely.
Recent proposals by the universities minister, David Willetts, to produce disaggregated immigration figures for students are not enough, it says, warning of a "climate of uncertainty for prospective and current international students which does not inspire confidence for those considering investing in a British university education", not helped by 14 changes to student immigration regulations since 2009. It is also concerned that making it harder for postgraduates to stay on after their degrees means the UK is in effect training its competitors, becoming "the education outsourcing capital of the world".
The commission has strong words for the government but there remain question marks over whether it will have any teeth. Spittle says he has spoken to Willetts about the report and, while he is non-committal about the minister's reaction, says he is "optimistic" that it will lead to action because of the broad spread of opinion it reflects – from politicians on all sides of both Houses of Parliament, students, universities and business – and the degree of consensus reached.
He also believes the time is right. "I think we have to look at the whole system end to end, starting with young children, all the way through their schooling, through university, to right at the high end of that process," he says.
As chief technology officer of IBM and a former chair of the Technology Strategy Board, with an MA in geography from Edinburgh University, Spittle says systems thinking shows that actions taken early on in a cycle have a significant impact down the line. "I don't think this is a minority game," he says. "I think this is a very important part of the UK economy. I think it's also a very important part of social mobility."
Source: 22nd October 2012, The Guardian by Harriet Swain
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/oct/22/postgraduate-study-social-mobility-loans

Thursday 29 November 2012

Jurys Inn graduate scheme recruits for 2013

Jurys Inn is recruiting for its fast track graduate programme that will offer graduates the chance to start work in the hospitality industry.
The GROW Graduate Programme includes training sessions in guest care, finance and budgets, revenue management and effective communications. Successful hires are also mentored by senior level employees throughout the two year programme. At the end of the course, recruits are expected to be ready to take on assistant manager roles.
Last year, Jurys Inn received the only Gold Award from Investors In People for an international hotel group.
Jennifer Lee, HR Director at Jurys Inn Group, says: “Each year we recruit 20 new graduates to the GROW programme who then work across our 32 hotels located in the UK, Ireland and the Czech Republic.
“As a company we are committed to creating and supporting exceptional people, and to achieving a culture that values people and their contributions to the business.  The GROW Programme provides these bright talents with a structure and support to help fully develop their potential.”
Source: 19th October 2012, askGrapevine HR.

Wednesday 28 November 2012

Graduates to be offered £20,000 to train as computer science teachers

Graduates are to be offered £20,000 scholarships to train as computer science teachers in an initiative launched by the government and backed by companies including Microsoft and Facebook.
The move is part of a package of reforms aimed at overhauling computer science education, giving children the skills to write programs rather than simply focusing on word processing skills.
The education secretary, Michael Gove, announced on Friday that current information and communications technology teacher training courses will be axed from next year. Instead, ministers will offer scholarships worth £20,000 to attract high-achieving graduates to train as computer science teachers.
Teachers and industry leaders are concerned that the way ICT is currently taught in schools leaves children bored and learning little beyond the most basic digital skills.
Under the new measures, industry experts have set out the subject knowledge required of all new computer science teachers. This includes being able to demonstrate an understanding of key concepts such as algorithms and logic.
The new teacher training courses will begin next September, when around 50 scholarships will be available to applicants with a 1st or a 2.1 degree.
Gove said: "Computer science is not just a rigorous, fascinating and intellectually challenging subject. It is also vital to our success in the global race.
"If we want our country to produce the next Sir Tim Berners-Lee – creator of the internet – we need the very best computer science teachers in our classrooms. They need to have the right skills and deep subject knowledge to help their pupils."
The government also announced that about 500 existing teachers with an ICT background would receive training to teach computer science. About half of these will be expert teachers who will share their skills and knowledge with other teachers. A network of computer science teaching excellence will forge links between schools, universities and employers. Computer science departments at universities including Cambridge, Manchester and Imperial College have already signed up, as have Microsoft, BT and IBM.
In January, Gove scrapped the existing programme of study for ICT in schools to make way for new lessons designed with input from employers and academics.
Ian Livingstone, chair of the Next Gen Skills campaign, which lobbies for better computer science teaching, said: "Having dedicated, high-calibre computer science teachers in schools will have a powerful effect. They will enable children to be creators of technology rather than being simply passive users of it. Whether it's making games, fighting cybercrime or designing the next jet propulsion engine, computer science is at the heart of everything in the digital world."
The British Computer Society, the professional body for IT, said schoolchildren needed an "intellectually rigorous" computer science education.
Dr Bill Mitchell, director of the BCS Academy of Computing, said: "Our vision is for every secondary school to have outstanding computer science teachers."
Source: 19th October 2012, The Guardian by Jeevan Vasagar – Education Editor.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/oct/19/computer-science-lessons-facebook-update

Tuesday 27 November 2012

Social mobility flatlining at best, says government adviser

Social mobility in the UK could be reversed unless the government and universities make changes to encourage and pay for more students from disadvantaged backgrounds to take degrees, according to the government's independent adviser on the issue.
Alan Milburn said in a report that social mobility was now "flatlining at best" after gains in the early part of the last decade.
"Given the headwinds that universities and higher education institutions are facing – tuition fees, student caps, public funding constraints – there's a real danger things will go backwards, rather than forwards," Milburn told the Guardian. "As the economy changes, who gets into university does become a very important driver of social mobility."
The report recommends changes across government policy and the way universities select, fund and encourage students from more disadvantaged areas, who he argues have been shown to do better at university than pupils from private schools with the same grades.
Suggestions include offering all students from poorer backgrounds an interview and considering offering places to those with lower grades.
Acknowledging pressure on public spending during the recession, Milburn calls on all parties to commit to government funding for higher education rising from 1.2% currently to 1.5%, the average for the OECD group of advanced economies.
The former Labour MP and cabinet member, who was the first person in his family to go to university, said social mobility created "fallers as well as risers", echoing candid comments by the Liberal Democrat business secretary, Vince Cable, who told an audience on Wednesday that social mobility was often a "two-way street" and "a zero-sum game".
"We want everyone to move up and no one to move down," said Cable. "But in the real world not everyone can be a star. Social mobility is often embodied in the comprehensive school pupil who reaches Oxbridge, but what about the school dropout who finished up in a lowly menial job? That is also social mobility. But this is surely what meritocracy is all about – success through hard work, not through birth."
Milburn's report says universities spend more than £400m to soften the impact of higher tuition fees on students from poorer backgrounds, but says there is little evidence that it is well spent, and calls for deep changes. It advocates that money is spent not just on reducing fees but helping to fund poorer students, and calls for a new version of the scrapped Educational Maintenance Allowance, intended to help poorer pupils remain in school to do A-levels.
Universities are asked to agree to use "contextual data" when assessing applications to give pupils from worse schools a better chance, even if they have lower grades. Because some universities – especially from the Russell Group of higher ranked institutions – have objected to such a move in the past, Milburn offers them alternatives, including running new programmes to assess and prepare school-leavers, such as summer schools, and guaranteeing interviews to pupils from schools in disadvantaged areas.
Ministers are urged to scrap a cap on student numbers, which Milburn calls an artificial limit on aspiration, and to better explain the tuition fees policy, under which students start repaying their loans when their earnings rise above a certain threshold. One option would be to rename the policy a graduate tax, which it is "in all but name", says Milburn, though he says it might be too late for that.
He also calls for more funding for post-graduates, probably through upfront loans, saying the issue is "in danger of becoming a social mobility timebomb".
The proposal to re-introduce the EMA was widely welcomed by social and education organisations, including the children's charity Barnados, which said it had evidence that children were having to choose between the cost of breakfast and their bus fare to school.
The left-of-centre IPPR thinktank welcomed the report's suggestion that "we should look at applying the lessons of the pupil premium in schools to the university sector, with more funding being provided to institutions if they recruit from disadvantaged backgrounds".
Source: 18th October 2012, The Guardian, Juliette Jowit, Political Correspondent.

Monday 26 November 2012

AGR project puts spotlight on fair access to graduate jobs

The Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR), which represents many big, blue-chip graduate employers, has been awarded government funding for a project that aims to ensure applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds have fair access to internships and jobs.
The AGR will seek to persuade employers to review their selection criteria so that candidates from less well-off socioeconomic backgrounds are not excluded. Carl Gilleard, chief executive of the AGR, commented, ‘We will continue to call for understanding of the way in which outdated selection criteria can discriminate against those from disadvantaged backgrounds and stifle social mobility.’
The summer 2012 edition of the AGR’s biannual survey of its members revealed that just one in ten employers planned to monitor the socioeconomic backgrounds of graduates recruited to their organisations. Over half (54.6%) did not collect socioeconomic data and did not plan to do, while just over a fifth did not gather this data at the time of the survey, but had plans to do so in future.
The issue of whether the best-paid graduate jobs are equally available to all regardless of background is likely to become increasingly contentious following the introduction of higher tuition fees, against a backdrop of concerns about whether social mobility in the UK has stalled.
A survey carried out by TARGETjobs IT earlier this year found that IT companies that include UCAS points as cut-offs among their criteria for graduate scheme applicants could unwittingly be hampering social mobility.
AGR to promote the Higher Education Achievement Report
The AGR also received funding from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) for another project that will encourage employers to make use of the Higher Education Achievement Report (HEAR) when recruiting graduates.
The HEAR is a new report card for graduates which all universities can now adopt if they wish, though it is not obligatory. It aims to give employers a detailed picture of graduates’ course marks as well as information about extracurricular achievements such as volunteering or involvement in societies. It is intended to supplement traditional degree classifications.
We reported earlier this month that Mr Gilleard hoped the introduction of the HEAR would help employers move away from using a 2.1 degree result as a cut-off when filtering applications. The HEAR has already been taken up by more than 80 institutions.
However, a report in the Telegraph last week said that according to Times Higher Education magazine, up to 10 of the Russell Group universities had as yet shown no interest in introducing the new system. Oxford and Cambridge were said to be among the institutions that were not planning to use the HEAR.
Jane Clark, Barclays’ head of corporate and investment banking campus recruitment in Europe and Asia, has been seconded to the AGR on a part-time basis to lead its projects on fair recruitment criteria and the HEAR. Both projects will be carried out in partnership with the Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services (AGCAS).
Source: 18th October 2012, Posted by Alison_TARGETjobs

Sunday 25 November 2012

Universities to coach poorest students or cut entry levels

Universities will either have to offer coaching for disadvantaged applicants or relax entry requirements for these students, a review will recommend.
Alan Milburn, the former Labour minister appointed as the Coalition’s social mobility tsar, will say that universities must do more to increase the number of students from poor backgrounds.
In a report to be published today, Mr Milburn will call for the use of “contextual data”, such as information about family income, social background and schooling, to be taken into account by universities when setting the grade offers to be made to applicants.
The Government last night supported the increased use of such data. The recommendation risks disadvantaging middle-class teenagers and those attending private schools who may have to achieve higher A-level grades to get into university.
Mr Milburn will say that universities investing in rigorous outreach programmes by sending staff into schools in disadvantaged areas to coach children on exams and interviews can avoid relaxing entry requirements. Mr Milburn will highlight the effectiveness of university-run summer camps for 16- and 17-year olds.
The former Cabinet minister, appointed by Nick Clegg in August 2010, will also suggest that the Government considers paying a “premium” to universities for each student recruited from a disadvantaged background. Senior Liberal Democrat sources said the plan was being “seriously studied”. A source close to the inquiry said: “Universities now have a choice. They can either make more use of contextual data or they need to get out into the community to help children from disadvantaged backgrounds to achieve the necessary qualifications.”
Alan Milburn, the former Labour minister appointed as the Coalition’s social mobility tsar, will say that universities must do more to increase the number of students from poor backgrounds.
In a report to be published today, Mr Milburn will call for the use of “contextual data”, such as information about family income, social background and schooling, to be taken into account by universities when setting the grade offers to be made to applicants.
The Government last night supported the increased use of such data. The recommendation risks disadvantaging middle-class teenagers and those attending private schools who may have to achieve higher A-level grades to get into university.
Mr Milburn will say that universities investing in rigorous outreach programmes by sending staff into schools in disadvantaged areas to coach children on exams and interviews can avoid relaxing entry requirements. Mr Milburn will highlight the effectiveness of university-run summer camps for 16- and 17-year olds.
The former Cabinet minister, appointed by Nick Clegg in August 2010, will also suggest that the Government considers paying a “premium” to universities for each student recruited from a disadvantaged background. Senior Liberal Democrat sources said the plan was being “seriously studied”. A source close to the inquiry said: “Universities now have a choice. They can either make more use of contextual data or they need to get out into the community to help children from disadvantaged backgrounds to achieve the necessary qualifications.”
Source: 18th October 2012, The Telegraph by Robert Winnett – Political Editor

Saturday 24 November 2012

AGR to raise awareness of Higher Education Achievement Report

The Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR) has announced that it has received funding from the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS) to carry out two projects, focussing on degree classification and social mobility.
The first project will aim to encourage employers to make use of the Higher Education Achievement Report (HEAR) in the recruitment and selection of graduates. The HEAR is intended to supplement the degree classification system, by giving a far richer and broader picture of students’ achievements at university. A student’s degree class will be clearly stated in the HEAR, whilst also giving employers information about their extra-curricular activities, achievements, experiences and skills.
 The AGR has long argued that the current system of degree classification is not sufficient to give recruiters a rounded picture of graduates in today's competitive labour market, and the organisation called for the HEAR to be introduced in its 2010 manifesto. More than 80 institutions are now operating or introducing the HEAR and the project is intended to raise awareness of its benefits amongst employers.
The second project is aimed at persuading employers to review their selection criteria, in order to ensure that they are not compromising the access that applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds have to internships and jobs. The issue of social mobility has been of increasing concern for the AGR; the organisation has recently begun to monitor its members’ about their collection of socio-economic data.
Both projects will be carried out in partnership with the Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services (AGCAS).
Carl Gilleard, Chief Executive of the Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR), said: “We are delighted to have received this funding from BIS, which will enable us to continue raising awareness of important changes taking place in higher education and graduate recruitment.
“Whilst the HEAR is new territory for employers, it is one that the AGR believes will offer many benefits to recruiters and students. It is already acting as a catalyst for change, with students better equipped to consider the skills they have developed and to articulate their value to employers, and one of our projects will support this progress further. In addition, we will continue to call for understanding of the way in which outdated selection criteria can discriminate against those from disadvantaged backgrounds and stifle social mobility.”
Source: 18th October 2012, Training Zone by Jon Kennard in Strategy

Friday 23 November 2012

You will never think in the same way again

The latest figures from the Graduate Management Admissions Council (Gmac) show that employment prospects for business Masters graduates are holding steady, despite challenging economic conditions. So what value do employers attach to an MBA, and can it still help you get a job?
Many students seem to think so. Some 79 per cent of 2011 full-time MBA graduates said the qualification was "essential" to securing their first role after graduation, according to the Gmac Alumni Perspectives survey, while 62 per cent had job offers in place upon leaving the course. "There are definitely skills people are coming away with that make them attractive hires," says Michelle Sparkman-Renz, Gmac's director of research communications. This year's Corporate Recruiters survey projects that 67 per cent of employers are looking to recruit MBA graduates, compared with 68 per cent in 2011, which she sees as a strong performance in the current climate.
Motivation (57 per cent) and initiative (52 per cent) are the top two qualities employers cited as "likely to get students hired". With European companies increasingly looking to surmount economic challenges and cut costs, Sparkman-Renz believes mobile MBA graduates are ideally placed to assist. "Companies need people who are leaner, more strategic and can help them do more with less," she says.
An Association of MBAs (Amba) employer survey in 2010/11 found that 74 per cent believed an employee with an MBA offered more than those without one, valuing them for their strategic thinking and analytical abilities. "When the job market is highly competitive, it is important to have a strong differentiator. The MBA qualification gives you that," says Carol Turner, Amba's communications manager.
While business knowledge, job prospects and salary potential are at the top of the wish list for European MBA students, their breadth and depth of knowledge will be a vital selling point to recruiters. Marieke Steffens, director of career and personal development at Nyenrode Business University, explains, "A professional with an engineering background who is able to complement those skills with the in-depth insights into the academic and practical aspects of leadership gained through the MBA, presents an extremely interesting value proposition for employers."
Employers see a need for business management skills in some areas not traditionally associated with them. Heather Baker, managing director of a PR consultancy, has just finished an executive MBA at London Business School. "Our sector tends to attract creatives who are simply not commercial thinkers," she says, which means she has had to train staff to understand the pressures on CEOs of the firms they do business with. "Creative sectors need more MBAs," she concludes.
However, recruiters caution that despite some positive statistics, a business management qualification is certainly not a magic bullet. "Not all companies see them as a valuable qualification," says Michael Gentle, head of consumer marketing for Monster UK and Ireland. "MBAs can be costly and the qualification doesn't necessarily mean you will automatically get a job, so it's important to consider if it is the right option for you."
On its own, an MBA won't transform a CV into a golden ticket, says Terence Perrin, chairman of the Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR); experience gained outside the classroom will also make a difference. "Recruiters are likely to value knowledge of rapidly changing global markets, perhaps gained during an international secondment, and the ability to work as part of a multicultural team. They'll also be looking for MBAs who have experience of both academic research and practical work and are comfortable working flexibly."
Graeme Read, MD of recruiter Antal International, adds, "Employers will still look first at experience and what candidates have previously done in their work and who with. Essentially the MBA is seen as the icing on the cake, rather than the cake itself."
An MBA might not be enough to guarantee success, but those who put their all into it will see more than a simple return on their investment, says Sparkman-Renz. "People tell us they feel better prepared for their career, that they have improved job satisfaction and better professional networks."
Adela Papac, an MBA at Westminster, suggests the ongoing appeal to students and employers alike is even harder to quantify: it creates fresh thinking. "The MBA shifts your mind to think differently. It gives you a lot of new insights, challenges your old beliefs and offers a new perspective on things."
Source: 17th October 2012, The Independent by Russ Thorne

Thursday 22 November 2012

Network Rail increases graduate intake for 2013

Network Rail has increased the number of graduate roles at the company, and the quantity of places offered on the general management graduate scheme has doubled for 2013.
There are more than 100 places in total available in engineering, finance, information management and a range of other specialisms. The management scheme now has more than 40 places available; twice as many as last year’s intake.
Network Rail is also offering suitable students year-long paid industrial placements across the business. The rail firm will recruit 16 undergraduates to begin sandwich placements that will last from nine months to a year.
Adrian Thomas, Head of Resourcing at Network Rail, says: “This is a growing sector, which means we need more bright, commercially-focused people to help us deliver the massive programme of investment we have promised the British public.”
Source: 17th October 2012, AskGrapevine HR
http://www2.askgrapevine.com/news/hr/article/2012-10-17-network-rail-increases-graduate-scheme-intake-for-2013/

Wednesday 21 November 2012

Jobs hard to find for young people but depends where you live, claims report

Young people are struggling in today’s labour market, with intense competition for work in some areas, according to a report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
However, the report – ‘The challenges for disadvantaged young people seeking work’ – finds that location plays a key role in a jobseeker’s chances of success.
The report looked at three labour market areas of varying strengths: weak, medium and strong. Researchers sent in more than 2,000 applications by fictional characters for real jobs as well as interviews with disadvantaged jobseekers, employers and labour market intermediaries. 
The report was published as today’s unemployment figures were released, showing  a 62,000 fall in the number of 18-24-year-olds who are unemployed.
The report found that overall there was a shortage of full-time daytime work. Half the jobs were for the minimum wage.
However, competition varied from five jobseekers per notified vacancy in the strong labour market area to more than 10 per vacancies in the medium and weak labour market areas.
Local candidates have an advantage when applying for low-skilled vacancies, the report found. This was especially the case for jobs with non-standard hours, as locals could be better relied on to get to work on time.
Retail was particularly competitive, with 66 young people chasing every retail job advertised in the worst hit areas and 24 in less badly hit areas.
Neil Yorke, a director of industrial and distribution recruiter The Best Connection, tells Recruiter that young people are finding it particularly hard to secure permanent work. “We are not finding a problem finding workers; we are finding a problem finding work for workers… People who are looking for permanent work are struggling.”
Yorke agrees there are variations between different areas of the country, but adds “I wouldn’t say it [the labour market] is strong anywhere.”
And he says there are some pockets of the country where some local people are not prepared to take jobs at the prevailing wage rates and where the jobs are being taken from those living outside the area.
The report suggests that because employers prefer local candidates, jobseekers who simply searched for work more widely may not necessarily improve their chances.
Kevin Green, chief executive of the Recruitment & Employment Confederation, adds: “Youth employment, though the lowest it’s been in over a year, is still unacceptably high and is unavoidable evidence that the government’s Youth Contract is not yet delivering. Relentless increases in the number of long term unemployed is worrying too as even when the economy picks up those hard core of unemployed may find they are permanently left behind.”
The report also found that because employers who advertise online tend to close them quickly as intense competition means that the applications limit is soon.
Contrary to perceptions, there was no evidence of postcode discrimination. The report suggests that the internet acts as a safeguard by providing a degree of anonymity.
Candidate care was also an issue with seven out of 10 applicants not hearing anything back from the employer.
However, there were substantial variations between local areas and occupation types; candidates in the weak labour market had to make twice as many application to generate the same number of positive responses as those in the strong area.
Office administration candidate needed to make almost double the number of applications as accounts clerks to get the same responses. However, typically the fictional candidates received a positive response such as a request for interview or more information to their fourth application.
Source: 17th October 2012 - Recruiter

Tuesday 20 November 2012

Businesses attempt to grow own talent and reduce youth unemployment

A new initiative aimed at making it easier for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to hire young people has launched.
The organisers hope it will break the cycle of ‘no work experience, no job’ faced by many in the labour market.
The new Graduate Foundation College (GFC), set up by Financial Skills Partnership (FSP), an industry partnership and skills champion for the sector, offers 150 selected unemployed graduates a concentrated 10-week pre-employment training course preparing them to join financial advisory firms.
When they have completed their training, these graduates will join SME practices in Birmingham, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Leeds, London and Manchester for a minimum of six months of paid industry experience.
The GFC was developed with the support of the UK Commission for Employment and Skills, and major sector employers including Aviva, Just Retirement, Scottish Widows and Tenet, and Redland Business Solutions.
Liz Field, FSP’s chief executive, adds: “The key advantage is that the graduates can hit the ground running and make an immediate contribution to the practices they join without the drain on resources of an induction programme which many smaller practices simply cannot provide.”
Source: 17th October 2012 - Recruiter

Monday 19 November 2012

Business leaders should help the younger generation develop soft skills

The business community, government and education sector need to work together more to help young people develop soft skills and become more employable, says Caroline Jenner.
Many European business leaders feel that the development of entrepreneurial and financial skills in young people is poor. They think that some young people lack the soft skills – such as presentation and networking skills, motivation, drive and teamwork – needed for a successful entry in the labour market. Some business leaders also agree that education systems do not effectively equip young people with the kind of skills needed to start a successful career.
Neither educational institutions nor governments, however, can solve these issues alone – the private sector needs to bridge the existing skills gap between education and business. It's an ugent problem – labour market changes require young people to acquire key competences early and update skills throughout their lives. This is especially relevant in these difficult economic times where young people are the last to be hired and the first to be fired.
There are countless debates on how to tackle the skills gap, but I believe the business community should use its human capital to help the younger generation through volunteering and mentoring. This engagement helps young people validate what they learn; they see how they can successfully apply their skills in a real-world context.
Business should play an active role in education – not as a replacement for educators, but as partners with experience from the field. An excellent example of skills development through corporate citizenship will be shown today in Brussels during Leaders-for-a-Day, a successful collaboration between private sector companies, non-profit and government stakeholders.
Leaders-for-a-Day gathers 40 students from all over the world in Brussels and each one shadows a high-level business leader or politician for a day. This allows them to get a unique insight into the dynamics of the world of work and a thorough understanding of the skills needed for success. The aim is to not only improve their business acumen, social and entrepreneurial skills but also boost students' confidence by engaging directly with senior leaders from a vast array of sectors and industries.
During my work for JA-YE Europe I have seen the role of business in society evolve. The private sector is increasingly involved in young people's education; teachers are working more closely with the business community around their schools. The private sector recognises the great contribution they can make in improving a young person's employability well before they enter the workforce. It is a softer way to transition young people into the working world and help them make better education and career choices. Educators are also able to show their students the relevance of what they are studying.
Through initiatives like Leaders-for-a-Day, leading members of the community take it upon themselves to set the example on behalf of their organisations. Not only does this have a positive social impact on an organisation, but it is also an excellent opportunity to attract talented young employees. We need to keep scaling up our volunteering schemes on the ground to help education systems respond better to the fast pace of change in the labour market and help young people to become more adaptable and flexible – and more employable.
Source: 16th October 2012, The Guardian by Caroline Jenner - Chief Executive of Junior Achievement Young Enterprise Europe.

Sunday 18 November 2012

London bucks increased youth unemployment trend

Long-term youth unemployment has fallen in London during the past two years, despite increases across the rest of the country.
According to a TUC analysis of government figures, the number of 16- to 24-year-olds out of work for longer than six months in England has increased by 23% since 2010, a rise of nearly 73,000 young people.
London was the only region to see a fall, with 10% fewer jobless young people between April to June 2012 than during the same period two years ago.
However, significant increases were seen across other parts of the country, with the number rising by 53% in the North-West of England and 40% in the East.
The TUC warned the overall rise has been accompanied by a 26% cut in government support for out-of-work youngsters.
It added that the Government will spend £98 million less for young people in England through jobseeker's allowances this year than was provided under the previous Government's Youth Guarantee scheme.
TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "Long-term youth unemployment is a ticking time bomb under the nation's finances, with severe consequences not just for young people but also for their communities and the country's wider economic crisis."
Source: 16th October 2012, Personnel Today.

Saturday 17 November 2012

Alan Milburn: 'school failure creating barrier to university'

University academics should be sent into underachieving state schools to raise standards among poor pupils, according to the Government’s social mobility tsar.
Lecturers should be expected to provide “intensive training” for teachers in disadvantaged areas to boost GCSE and A-level pass rates, said Alan Milburn.
Speaking ahead of the publication of a major report this week, he also called on teenagers in the state system to be given the same rigorous preparation for university applications and interviews as those in private schools.
The reforms are needed to dramatically increase the number of pupils from disadvantaged areas going on to Britain’s top universities, it was claimed.
Mr Milburn, the former Labour cabinet minister enlisted by the Coalition to review policies surrounding social mobility, warned that universities were currently wasting millions of pounds on bursaries and tuition fee discounts in an attempt to boost admission rates among deprived teenagers.
He claimed that poor GCSE and A-level results remained the biggest barrier to higher education, insisting that universities’ efforts should be channelled towards direct intervention at a much earlier age.
In a controversial move, his report will also call for institutions to be given more funding for each poor student recruited onto degree courses – creating additional incentives for universities to target deprived areas.
It will also recommend that universities routinely carry out background checks on students as part of the admissions process, allowing them to lower entry requirements for pupils from underperforming schools.
The disclosure is likely to fuel the debate surrounding “social engineering” in university admissions and lead to fresh fears that privately-educated schoolchildren are facing discrimination.
But Mr Milburn said: "There has been a lot of focus in recent years on the economic good that universities bring to the country, but there should be an equal focus on the social good they can bring.
“I think study after study shows that, for all the efforts the universities have made, they aren't properly recognising potential and aptitude in who they admit to university.”
Mr Milburn has been tasked by the Government to review policies aimed at improving social mobility in Britain. He has already criticised the lack of access to professional occupations and will publish a further report this week assessing barriers to top universities.
Speaking ahead of the launch, he quoted figures showing that the most advantaged 20 per cent of teenagers were seven times more likely to get into a leading institution than the poorest 40 per cent.
Currently, universities spend hundreds of millions of pounds giving poor students bursaries and subsidised tuition fees to take degree courses. But his report will claim that many pupils fail to apply in the first place because of poor performance at school.
“The principal reason… is not money, it’s qualifications,” he told The Sunday Times.
“The universities know that and argue that but then don’t put their money behind efforts to to help school kids in disadvantaged areas get better school qualifications.”
He said universities should provide “intensive training” for teachers in state schools and help increase the number of pupils studying tough subjects such as maths and science. He also suggested they should play a greater part in helping pupils apply to university.
“Most state school teachers are deeply ambitious for their pupils but, as a generalisation, private schools intensively prepare their pupils for university applications and admission in a way that state schools don’t,” he said.
Mr Milburn will also call for a higher education scheme similar to the pupil premium, which gives state schools a lump sum for every pupil recruited from poor homes.
He will also spell out the benefits of using “contextual data” – information on pupils’ family background, ethnicity, disabilities and the performance of their school. This is currently used by some universities to allow disadvantaged pupils to be admitted with lower A-level grades than teenagers attending top-performing schools.
Source: 14th October 2012, The Telegraph by Graeme Paton – Education Editor

Friday 16 November 2012

Universities drop traditional interviews which could favour private school pupils

Universities are scrapping traditional interviews over concerns that they favour applicants from middle class families and independent schools.
The move follows claims that the usual format, where candidates are questioned by a panel of academics, could give an advantage to confident and articulate pupils who have been coached in how to respond.
Instead, interviews are being replaced by a “speed dating” style process where each candidate undergoes a series of brief one-on-one “mini-interviews”, solving problems and taking part in roleplays rather than answering general questions about themselves.
The new assessments are seen as fairer because they reward innate skills, such as empathy, rather than eloquence.
It comes as universities face increasing pressure from the Government to broaden their intake and admit more students from poorer families and state schools.
Sixth formers applying this month to study medicine, dentistry or veterinary science at at least five institutions around the UK will undergo the new speed dating style assessments.
The technique, called multiple mini interview (MMI), was developed in universities in Canada and has been researched extensively.
Students spend five minutes with each assessor, a buzzer sounds, or a recorded voice tells them to move on to the next station.
Each interviewer scores the applicant independently and is unaware of how the student has performed at other stations.
At each station, students take part in a role play or are given a scenario in which they must think on their feet and demonstrate important skills.
Institutions which have adopted the new technique include St George’s Medical School, London; Queen’s University, Belfast; Dundee University medical school; Cardiff University school of dentistry; and the Royal Veterinary College, London.
Under the traditional interview system, candidates would have appeared for up to an hour in front of three or four academics, answering questions about their exam results, work experience, hobbies and their reasons for wanting to enter the profession.
The change is the latest aimed at increasing the social mix in medical schools, which have been dominated by middle-class students. Currently, nearly 30 per cent of medicine and dentistry students went to independent schools, which educate just 7 per cent of children.
At St George’s, which has pioneered MMI in the UK, students have been asked to imagine they have accidentally run over and killed their neighbour’s cat and must break the news to them.
“One element of multiple mini interview is fair and equitable access,” said Kenton Lewis, head of widening participation and student recruitment at St George’s where MMI was introduced fully last year.
“Potentially, someone who is educationally advantaged may have had a lot of opportunities to practise interviews and be more used to high level discussion, pulling together a higher level argument, going through that debate process.
“Rather than getting an interview panel to say 'Tell me about the skills you have,’ we are drilling down deeper and saying 'Demonstrate those skills.’
“One of the reasons we believe it is fairer is that we are less likely to be assessing how good somebody is at doing an interview and more likely to be assessing how good they are in the competency.”
The technique also guards against the well-researched tendency of interviewers to appoint students with similar backgrounds to their own. Privately-educated doctors and academics on the interview panel could be more likely to recruit independent school applicants.
“You are more likely to have a rapport with someone with shared experiences and values,” said Mr Lewis. “One of the ways the MMI is positive is that it limits the extent to which that happens because you are seeing seven or eight assessors.”
A decade ago, 55 per cent of St George’s intake was from state schools. The figure is now about 80 per cent. “The MMI is about maintaining that success,” Mr Lewis said.
The Royal Veterinary College, which hopes to increase its proportion of state school entrants from its current 80 per cent to 88 per cent by 2016/17, has introduced MMI for the first time this year.
The technique is set to expand further. Last year, universities, including Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Liverpool, Queen Mary, in London, and Sheffield, visited Cardiff University to investigate the use of MMI.
Chris Ramsey, the head of King’s School, in Chester, and co-chair of the Headmasters and Headmistresses Conference universities committee, said: “Good levels of articulacy should be developed at all good schools. They should not be the preserve of the independent sector and if they are, it perhaps says something about shortcomings elsewhere.
“The main reason why independent school pupils are disproportionately represented on medicine degrees is that pupils in our schools are more likely to study the science and maths subjects that medical schools require.”
HOW WOULD YOU DO IN THE NEW INTERVIEWS?
* An actor plays the role of your elderly neighbour. You have just accidentally run over your neighbour’s cat whilst reversing your car. You have 5 minutes to break the bad news to her.
This role-play tests insight, integrity, communication skills and empathy.
* You given details of 15 individuals, including their age, sex and occupation. A nuclear attack is imminent and you are only allowed to save 5 of them from destruction. Which ones and why?
A prioritisation exercise. The emphasis is on problem solving and rational thinking.
* Without using your hands, explain how to tie shoe laces.
Tests verbal communication skills, the ability to break down the task into a series of small steps and the interviews ability to check that the interlocutor is understanding what they are saying.
Source: 14 October 2012, The Telegraph by Julie Henry - Education Correspondent

Thursday 15 November 2012

Oxbridge admissions: universities to 'raise bar on entry'

Teenagers are facing tough new hurdles to get into Oxford and Cambridge next year amid increasing competition for places at top universities, it has emerged.
Rising numbers of students will be expected to score elite A* grades in A-levels for the first time to secure admission to Oxbridge, it was revealed.
Just days before the deadline to apply to the ancient institutions, it was also revealed that both universities are preparing to set more entry exams in addition to formal interviews.
Oxford alone will require almost nine-in-10 students to sit some form of aptitude test – up from around two-thirds in 2009.
The move will fuel fears that universities are still struggling to identify the most able applicants from the thousands of pupils leaving school with straight As at A-level.
It is also likely to make it harder for sixth-formers to secure places in 2013 as more students strive for the very best universities to secure value-for-money for a sharp hike in tuition fees.
This autumn, the imposition of annual fees of up to £9,000 for British and European students led to a 7.4 per cent drop in applications to universities nationally. But Cambridge bucked the trend by registering a two per cent increase, while demand fell by just 0.6 per cent at Oxford.
It is expected that competition next year will be just as fierce.
Caroline Lindner, managing director of Oxbridge Applications, which advises students on the admissions process, said the universities were creating increasingly sophisticated tools to select the brightest students.
“With so many people applying, admissions tutors need more checks and balances to make sure that they’re getting someone who is going to be suited to an Oxbridge way of teaching,” she said.
Students applying to Oxford and Cambridge must submit applications to the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) by midnight on Monday. The deadline also affects applications to study medicine, dentistry and veterinary science at other universities.
Cambridge already demands that all applicants should gain one A* and two As as a minimum entry requirement.
But the number of courses requiring an A* at Oxford will increase by a third this year – from 15 to 20. It will be demanded for the first time in biochemistry, biomedical sciences, experimental psychology, medicine and the combined psychology, philosophy and linguistics course. It is already needed for many maths, engineering and science degrees.
Figures from the organisation Supporting Professionalism in Admissions (SPA), which advises universities on admissions policies, also shows an increase in entry exams.
It said Cambridge was running 20 tests in 2013, one more than in 2012, with a new exam for psychological and behavioural sciences. Some 39 course combinations at Oxford also require an exam, up from 34 in 2012, figures show.
Universities use common admissions tests to dictate entry to subjects such as law, medicine, dentistry, veterinary science and maths. Many courses also rely on the thinking skills assessment, which tests critical thinking and problem solving.
Mike Nicholson, Oxford’s director of admissions, told the Telegraph that aptitude tests were particularly important in the humanities and social sciences, where the A* often failed to mark out the very brightest candidates.
He said that the rise in tests also reflected the fact that so many students were applying from other countries or sitting alternative qualifications in the sixth-form.
“Having a test that everybody does gives us a chance to benchmark candidates against each other, irrespective of the education system or country they have come from,” he said. “That is increasingly the reason why we are seeing the tests as being valuable; because the applications pool isn’t all doing A-level”.
Source: 12 October 2012, The Telegraph - Graeme Paton, Education Editor

Wednesday 14 November 2012

Closing the gap between classroom and workplace

"I always wanted to be a graphic designer,” says Kenton Robbins, business coach and regional director for Yorkshire and Humber at the Institute of Directors (IoD).
"When I left school, I sat down with the careers advisor and told her this. She said: 'Don't be stupid, there's no future in graphic design.' Some 25 years later, here I am, in a world led by design."
Plus ça change - or should that be 'nihil mutatur' for those of you educated in the post-war 'golden age'? Education secretary Michael Gove may believe in a gilded age of education and opportunity, but the above is a reminder how easy it is to view the past through one of the five million pairs of rose-tinted glasses the NHS distributed in said 1950s.
From lousy school career guidance to an expectation of university education, from courses in horse care and fish husbandry to classical Latin and History, from selective grammar schools to access for all, education has always been a political hot potato guaranteed to instil fear and worry in any government - and parent.
Now it is back at the top of the agenda once again, thanks to the UK's shocking youth unemployment of 1.03 million, a figure that has been rising since the early 2000s. At 22%, UK youth unemployment is the second highest in the G8, after Italy. One in 10 people aged 15 to 19 is 'not in education, employment or training' (the so-called NEETs) - among the highest in the OECD.
The Audit Commission estimates the cost to the taxpayer of these NEETs will be £13 billion over their lifetime, in terms of welfare payments, costs to health and so forth - and a further £22 billion in terms of loss to the economy and to their families.
Education results are poor, relative to spending in this country. Some 18% of 15-year-olds in the UK do not reach the OECD/PISA baseline Level 2 of literacy. Yet the UK spends more on children than most OECD countries, at just over £90,000 per child from birth up to the age of 18. This compares to an OECD average of just under £80,000.
The UK is slipping down the educational ladder and everyone has a view as to why this is: poor teaching, lack of discipline, or a system based on points and league tables that leads to a perverse incentive to offer qualifications that inflate results. Government interference, government ambivalence, terrible career counsellors that have never worked in business, lazy teachers, stressed teachers, bullying Ofsted inspectors, poor pay, high pay and too much holiday to boot, egotistical heads, bad parenting, badly behaved children… the list is endless.
But is this blame game helping anyone? And where are those that matter most in this debate, the young people society is letting down and the people who want to employ them? For the stark fact is: the gap between the classroom and workplace is growing.
A report jointly released last month by the Work Foundation and Private Equity Foundation reveals there has been a major rise in young people who are either unable, or taking longer, to make the first move from education to work. The report, Lost In Transition?, finds nearly half of NEETs in England now have no experience of sustained paid employment, beyond casual and holiday work. This represents more than 450,000 young people who have so far been unable to make the transition from learning to work.
Focusing solely on academic achievement is a red herring. With the exception of careers where a particular academic attainment at a high level is vital, for example, medicine or chemical engineering, it is less about getting eight A* grades at GCSE and more about helping children with employability skills - the somewhat detrimentally named 'soft skills' that are key to success in today's workplace.
"The labour market has changed considerably over the past few decades. First jobs are now less likely to be in manufacturing and more likely to be in the service sector, where skills such as communication, teamworking and customer service are important. For young people without the soft skills needed to access work in these growing sectors, finding employment has become increasingly difficult," says Work Foundation researcher and report author, Paul Sissons.
The number of young people leaving school and college with serious shortfalls in their employability skills is still high, according to the CBI/EDI Education and Skills Survey 2011. Some 55% of employers say they experience weakness in school leavers' self-management skills and 69% believe they have inadequate business and customer awareness. Even among graduates, the picture is worrying, with weaknesses identified in teamworking skills (20%) and problem-solving (19%).
Meanwhile, almost half of the employers report widespread weakness in core workplace skills among existing employees, with literacy and numeracy topping the list.
"Potential employers such as myself are dubious about the present value of A-levels and degrees now that they are available to the majority of students. We are confused by the new range of qualifications aimed at vocational studies, with the various credits and supposed equivalent qualifications. At the same time, we remain disappointed how often students are not well prepared for work," says Kevin Caley, managing director of Midlands-based company, Business Loan Network.
"As a former motor industry training officer, venture capital fund manager and now the founder of a rapidly growing small business seeking to employ its first junior staff, I am acutely aware of the difficulties facing school-leavers in this economic climate and of the confusion among small business owners. It is a problem that faces us all and unless it is addressed effectively, our economy and society will suffer for generations."
This issue is top of mind for CBI members, says James Fothergill, CBI head of education and skills policy. The CBI is due to release its latest skills survey next week and early indications are little has changed.
"Our members are only so concerned about grades. This is really about competency," says Fothergill. "What consistently comes out top in our education and skills survey are issues around teamworking, communication skills and self-management. Members are most satisfied with IT skills, but unimpressed with school leavers' ability to get up on time and their business and customer awareness. We are concerned there is a mismatch between the level of competency and what is needed to succeed at work."
It is tempting for those in the educational establishment to view such comments as 'education-bashing', but Fothergill is quick to point out that employers are keen to work with schools and colleges to help address this issue. "Business is not going to get anywhere if it carps on the sidelines. Employers need to roll their sleeves up and get involved in mentoring, apprenticeships and providing career information and guidance."
But is it the responsibility of employers to close the gap and take on a teaching role? According to the CBI's study, half of employers now support careers advice and one in four provide school governors. A third have increased their school engagement activity and two-thirds have built links with secondary schools. Two-fifths of employers are providing remedial training to school and college leavers
There is a vested interest in business getting involved in education and helping to close the gap. It enables it to access a greater pool of young people, helps develop leadership skills in existing employees through mentoring and coaching, is good for reputation, can be part of a CSR strategy - and finally helps build loyalty in the local area.
"It is our responsibility to get involved," agrees Debbie Conroy, HR training and development manager at Rank Group, which works closely with Jobcentres in the area of work experience and which is in the process of launching an apprenticeship scheme. "It is to the benefit of the employer, to the economy and to the country as a whole.
"But," she adds, "schools do need to start preparing students so that, when they go for an interview, they have already been given some idea: things such as how to do a handshake, how to put a CV together, ensuring their shoes are clean. It's dog eat dog out there and students need to realise it is no longer about hugs all round - they may be going up against their best friend."
"It has become the responsibility of employers to teach and this is costing them a lot of money," adds Andrew Humphries, a dealmaker for the UK Government Global Entrepreneur Programme and co-founder of the Attitude Academy, which provides corporate-style attitude and motivational coaching specifically for 13-to-18-year-olds in school. "But it is not the employer's role. They are there to tell people how to do their job, not how to do life."
Frank Bowley, deputy director of the skills strategy unit at BIS, the Department of Business, Skills and Innovation, believes, despite an investment of some £50 billion annually in training staff, employers are "not good at engaging more fully with more formal education" and that there may be ways of incentivising business to shift the pattern of this spending to get better results.
"Business should engage with education, but in my opinion it doesn't need to do as much as it thinks," retorts Humphries. "This is not about great big investments and programmes, it is about inspiring and sowing seeds at a young age. It should not break the bank."
The problem, according to Humphries, is that society is not addressing the fundamental questions that are having an impact on how young people view work.
"We have changed as a society and there is a generational difference in the drive of people," he says. "For so long, we have expected that companies should provide employment throughout our working lives. There has been a slow slide into the expectation that society will provide. We expect business to owe us a living, so we can meet our expectations of a house, two cars and holidays. Now we are asking, 'why is the country not providing me with the environment to get all this without much effort?'" He contrasts this with people in the US, where the expectation is to work harder and be better than the competition. "We need a better attitude to work and to take responsibility for our happiness and our lives," he says, "and we need parents to stop abdicating responsibility to the state and business. The problem is, many of today's parents are not skilled themselves and we are going to find we have skipped a generation.
"We now need to concentrate on the next generation, the 13-18-year-olds. And, most importantly, we need to help these kids understand how to set goals, for the short, medium and longer term."
This view may rankle with some, but it chimes with business. The consensus is that, if we are to close the gap between the classroom and education, we need to start earlier with children, foster relationships between teachers and local businesses, including mentoring, put more emphasis on teaching children about today's workplace and the type of skills required and, most importantly, help parents and children to understand their responsibilities.
This is no easy task, so no wonder politicians, the educational establishment and some in business prefer to concentrate on their war of words. But there are ways forward that do not involve ripping up and starting again, taking retrograde steps and retreating to a 'golden age' or throwing money down a bottomless pit.
"The old system is not fit for purpose," says Marius Frank, CEO of curriculum development organisation and awarding body Asdan (see box, right). "We are building our education on sand. But that does not mean we should start again. We need to supplement and complement this system, not dismantle it. One of the fundamental reasons we have still have this problem in education is the tool by which we choose to justify performance and success: the exam.
"It is easy to judge individual success in an exam. It is harder to judge soft skills. The didactic information transfer has failed. It is anticipated that young people today may have seven different careers in their working life and we now need to help develop thoughtful, creative, equipped children who aspire to move from shop floor to boardroom. The way to do this is to legitimise and build out of classroom learning and help the teacher become learning manager, not teacher."
This view correlates with the OECD's Skills Strategy, released last month, which shifts focus from a quantitative notion of human capital, measured in years of formal education, to the skills people acquire, enhance and lose over their lifetimes. "Governments need to raise the quality of education and training at all levels, so that investment in skills development is effective and people leave education not only with a qualification/diploma but also with the corresponding skills," it says. "Clear certification of learning outcomes and recognition of non-formal learning are incentives for training."
The report adds: "The demands placed on teachers to improve student skills cannot be underestimated" - and in addition it suggests teachers work collaboratively with people in other organisations, in networks of professional communities and in different sorts of partnership arrangements.
To enable this, the IoD's Robbins says academics need to be less wary of business people - and vice versa.
"Many teachers are high in IQ, not EQ. If you shake a teacher's hand, they can feel uncomfortable, yet it is the first thing you do in business. Academics look at things differently to businesspeople and can be intimidated," he says.
"But then you also get businesspeople who think teachers have an easy life, getting 12 weeks off a year. They think they can turn up at a school and treat it like being in a business. Businesspeople need to take the time to understand education and the school. There is an opportunity for a group to deliver orientation for school mentors before they go in."
Robbins says businesses need to build trust and coaches/ mentors need to become regular figures within the academic environment, not just dip in and out. CBI's Fothergill agrees and says business cannot expect teachers to innately understand the business world.
"Career guidance is the responsibility of individual schools and you can't expect all head teachers to come up with cohesive schemes. We are expecting people who are not qualified to provide this guidance. Teachers have enough on their plates. We can't hope they understand what is out there," he says.
Rank's Conroy points out: "Many teachers have never had an interview as we know it in business."
But there are signs teachers want business to help in understanding all this. Kim Liddiard, a former HR director at publishing group Haymarket, the Forestry Commission and BskyB, has just launched YourFutureYourLife, a business dedicated to supporting young people by identifying their skills and ambitions, building self- confidence and self awareness as well as an appreciation and awareness about the work environment.
"Head teachers are saying, 'we can help academically, but we haven't a clue how to help our students find the right path or what employers want'. They are crying out for help," she says.
Liddiard is working with individual 14-year-olds and about to start a school pilot. She believes the biggest issue is helping young people move from dependency of childhood to independency in adulthood in an age of 'cotton wool kids' and league tables.
"Parents are doing everything for children these days and there has been a tendency for some parents to view their children as an extension of themselves and their success. Meanwhile, schools want their students to become doctors and lawyers and universities want first class degrees, so they can get their research funds."
The result, she says, is confusion all round for young people who have little understanding about financial education, career options or what lies ahead.
"One student told me she was taking media studies. I asked if she realised there were more people taking media studies degrees than jobs in the media? Graduates are saying they have been sold a pup. They think if they get a degree there will be a job at the end; instead, they are ending up in call centres with large debts."
If the gap between classroom and workplace is to be closed, all stakeholders must play a role. At policy level, the Government needs to consider what 'qualification' means in the 21st century.
Young people should not have to narrow down subjects so early and greater emphasis must be put on skills in the curriculum. Government also needs to consider how it measures performance. Liddiard adds: "As an HRD in business, I always say, be careful what you measure. It changes behaviour."
At educational level, teachers should view business with less suspicion and instead find ways of working with it.
There needs to be more emphasis on career education, rather than it being viewed as what Asdan's Frank describes as "minor fluff in the navel of the school curriculum".
Employers need to develop sustainable relationships with schools, not just ad hoc ones that look good on their CSR report.
There may be a greater role in employer funding in education to be considered by policy- makers. Business also needs to engage with children in education at an earlier age.
As the CBI's Fothergill says: "We tend to forget how capable a 10/11-year-old can be, if given the opportunity."
Parents and children need to take ownership of their future. The role of parents cannot be ignored and the CBI will be considering the employer view on this issue later this year.
Where there is a huge unexploited area is in taking the HR skills of mentoring and coaching into the classroom. If there is one thing business could do immediately, and inexpensively, to help close the gap, it would be to go into schools and inspire.
The consequences to society and the economy of not closing this gap are severe. "We know if young people haven't got on the first rung of the job ladder by 24, they will suffer the consequences for the rest of the lives," says Shaks Ghosh, chief executive of Private Equity Foundation. "Some will never work."
But the benefits of closing the achievement gap in the UK are overwhelming. A study by OECD, in collaboration with the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, suggests narrowing the gap by bringing all students to a baseline level of minimum proficiency for the OECD could give GDP increases in the UK of $6 trillion.
Even a 14-year-old must know that's a lot of zeros.
City & Guilds: supporting more young people into work
Of all the challenges our country faces, the number of unemployed young people will cause the most long-term damage. Unemployment has been rising steadily over the past few years and alarmingly almost a quarter (22.2%) of 16-24-year-olds are out of work.
The good news is that there is a tremendous amount of energy and goodwill within the Government, as well as in the education sector and industry more broadly, to reverse this trend. The £1 billion Youth Contract was launched, there is a renewed focus on apprenticeships, and business bodies such as the CBI are launching initiatives aimed at tackling the crisis.
While we acknowledge and welcome all solutions, at City & Guilds we feel there needs to be a more cohesive strategy across Government that gets to the heart of the issue and, crucially, is geared towards supporting young people. We need to bring together key stakeholders from across education, business and the Government to ensure more young people don't slip through the cracks. Unfortunately, some initiatives, such as the Youth Contract, give cause for concern, because the number of agencies involved overlap - and confusion and inefficiency can arise, all of which is letting young people down.
We need a single group of MPs representing all political parties whose sole focus is to increase youth employment and represent the voice of young people. It would be a group that would debate and critique proposals and provide balanced recommendations on effective strategy to address the issue of youth employment.
Crucially, this group would listen to young people, to create better-informed, long-term solutions.
In February this year, City & Guilds commissioned the first comprehensive study of young people's views around education and employment since the current economic crisis began, in order to bring the experience of young people into the debate.
Based on this rationale and armed with the results from the study, on 1 May we called for an all-party parliamentary group (APPG) with a particular remit to investigate and make recommendations on: careers guidance, apprenticeships for young people, entrepreneurship and work experience. David Miliband (Labour), Stephen Lloyd (Liberal Democrat) and Graham Stuart (Conservative) are all keen to explore the idea further.
We believe that as the UK's leading vocational awarding organisation, we are well equipped to drive this work forward, which will seek to get to grips with the root causes of youth unemployment.
I see the APPG functioning in a number of ways. First, we would work to develop careers guidance that is fit for purpose, engages young people and leads to better employment outcomes. In addition, we would consider the reasons behind the decline in the number of young people (16-19) taking apprenticeships and ways to encourage greater participation. Consideration will also be given to the type of support the Government should offer entrepreneurial young people to enable them to set up in business on their own.
We must take action now to ensure young people get the advice, experience and teaching they deserve. Politicians, employers, policy-makers and sector leaders must start working together to get young people working.
Chris Jones is CEO and director general, City & Guilds
ModBac: well rounded
Charitable social enterprise, Asdan, an awarding body providing courses to 6,000 UK and international schools, colleges, youth centres and training providers, has a mission to build an enduring culture of achievement.
In a study of more than half a million pupils by the Bristol Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning and Education at the University of the West of England, Asdan's Certificate of Personal Effectiveness (CoPE) was last month shown to help pupils achieve greater GSCE success. The study found young people who passed CoPE raised their chances of achieving A* to C grades in English by 10% and achieving five A* to C, including English and maths, by 5%. The impact was most significant in those in less privileged educational groups.
Now Asdan chief executive Marius Frank, who last year won the HR Excellence Award for Most People-Focused CEO in the public/not-for-profit sector, has set his sights on helping employers and schools find a way through the minefield of qualifications and skills with a tool to help close the gap between the classroom and workplace.
The Modern Baccalaureate (ModBac) is what Frank describes as an award for the 21st century.
ModBac provides a framework to accredit not only high standards and knowledge, but also the application of that knowledge and development of skills in real-life contexts. "The existing position is highly confusing for employers, due to performance measures," says Frank.
"As someone who was a head teacher, I have sympathy for them, what with diploma this, that worth three GCSEs - and so on. It is tempting to always revert to the yardstick you understand - basic GCSEs - and then the system becomes self-perpetuating."
ModBac identifies seven areas of learning and achievement that build competence and character, thereby leading to a whole education experience.
These are: IT/computing; foreign language/international; enterprise/financial capability; work experience/careers education; community/citizenship; personal challenge; and extended project.
Both existing academic attainment through the curriculum and external informal learning are recognised within this - for example, skills gained through belonging to the Scouts or through competitive sport.
The benefit to employers is visibility of school leavers' overall skills and development. For example, the skills passport element takes in self-management, problem-solving, working with others, presentation and discussion, among other areas.
Schools register learners with the programme and this opens a web-based transcript. This keeps a record of qualifications completed and grades achieved, but also enables learners to upload evidence of their wider learning and participation.
The learner ends up with a certificate that shows all the achievements. Each certificate will feature a unique QR code that, when scanned, links to a secure website holding all the details of the learner's qualifications, skills and wider achievement.
"This saves time for employers and gives them a standardised overview of attainment, plus a rounded view of the child," explains Frank. "It is like an electronic CV that has already been securely verified by the school."
Asdan launches ModBac next week with a pilot group of schools. "It is a movement. You don't have to do it," says Frank. "But everything we have done to design the ModBac is there to help children achieve more through a transparent portfolio of evidence of their skills. It helps to redefine what success looks like and we hope businesses give it a chance."
Source: 6th June 2012, HR Magazine by Sian Harrington